By John Yeoman.
The Wicked Writing Blog.
In a previous posting Dame Agatha was accused of being unconsciously Freudian; now another critic slams her for being unconsciously xenophobic and racist:
I have just been reading Agatha Christie’s short stories. But to enjoy her fully today, I suspect, you need to be a social historian — or a novelist. In everything she wrote, she employed one deep secret of her craft. But she may not even have been conscious of it.
It took 70 years of cultural change to reveal it.
That secret is, simply, that she shocks the reader with endless social transgressions. Her every story is coded with social prejudice and her characters are class-labelled on arrival. Whenever her characters are in conflict, it’s not simply a case of whodunnit? A little class war is also being played out.According to Yeoman, the secret of Agatha Christie's success lay in who comprised the bulk of her readership:
Given that Christie’s readers were largely lower middle class, they must have gained great satisfaction in seeing their social betters unmasked as rogues.
Xenophobia and racial prejudice are everywhere in Christie, and provide rich opportunities for social conflict. Nobody born south of the English Channel can be entirely trusted. A rich American or ex-colonial might be admitted cautiously to one’s parlour but only once the ladies have been forewarned about his habits.
Any whiff of the Jew, Negro or Asiatic and that person will be thrust beyond the pale with one stiff lift of the eyebrow. ‘Decent fellow, in his way. But not one of us.’ (To be fair to Christie, these attitudes prevailed in the England of the 1920s and are even more pronounced in G. K. Chesterton.)It remains to be determined just which was more important to Christie's readers, both then and now: class conflict or a rattling good mystery.
Resources:
- Short story collections by Dame Agatha are on sale HERE, HERE, and HERE, but there's a good chance they've been bowdlerized.
Category: Detective fiction criticism
No comments:
Post a Comment